“Constant complaint is the poorest sort of pay for all the comforts we enjoy”
That was Benjamin Franklin, talking about the good old days of the 18th century where America’s GDP per capita was less than the poorest country on Earth today and life expectancy was around 40 years.
—x—
Answer quickly: How much has GDP per capita grown during these 8 years of the Bush government?

Hmm, not bad for a country that went through a terrorist attack, 2 wars and at least 1 recession, no?
—x—
The favorite topic now at the liberal media is how gas prices are basically destroying the country. Every single problem, from truckers to mortgage giants has to do with gasoline.
I do ask myself how people on Europe are surviving though. After all, gas prices there are now around 10$ a gallon and have been higher than what we pay now in the US at least for the last 10 years.
—x—
I know I sound like a broken record but I think the press is probably the biggest player in this. I don’t know if this is orchestrated or not, but after Bush’s victory in 2004 watching the news became impossible.
Everything is negative, no matter what. When the house market was booming, they showed how young couples could not afford a house. Now that prices went down, they show the ‘huge’ foreclosure rates (around 1% of mortgages!). When oil goes up, the world is ending. When it goes down, the economy is crashing.
We hear about the ‘weak’ dollar but do we hear about the all time high exports? And how about VW building the first factory here since 1988 because it became cheaper to produce here than import from Germany?
—x—
The worst part is that people end up believing in this. We have a 5.5% unemployment rate, stock market still around 11 thousand and people act like this is the great depression.
This increasing lack of perspective is one of the things that concern me the most here in the US. Maybe it is just a natural consequence of a rich population (who can afford to have people living without working out of other people’s trash) but still this is something that in my view could destroy this country.


9 comments
Comments feed for this article
July 16, 2008 at 4:08 am
Claudio
“This increasing lack of perspective is one of the things that concern me the most here in the US.”
Vai demorar muito para vocês atingirem o patamar do Bananão (nem quero ver onde o Bananão estára quando isso acontecer) mas a tendência hoje é o mundo todo se tornar mais e mais idiota.
Lá pelo ano 2735 o ser humano sera incapaz de amarrar os sapatos sozinho.
Como diriam os Borgs, “Resistance is futile.”
July 17, 2008 at 3:47 am
Leonardo
Digam, por favor, que aquele site dos freegans é fake.
July 17, 2008 at 6:49 am
Me
Hehehe, I know it looks like it. Eu ouvi sobre eles na NPR (mais da metade dos meus posts acabam saindo de la
) e quando eu vi o site achei que era sacanagem.
Mas aparentemente nao eh:
http://www.sandiegoreader.com/news/2008/jun/25/cover/
http://www.nbc15.com/home/headlines/9140371.html
E na reportagem do radio eles descreviam como eles acham coisas otimas no lixo: roupas, comida, eletronicos, mobilia. O cara ate dizia que freegans sao a melhor solution para global warming.
July 17, 2008 at 11:51 am
Rafael Figueira
“How much has GDP per capita grown during these 8 years of the Bush government?”
Mas ao mesmo tempo o median household income se mantem abaixo do nivel de 1999-2000 (http://www.census.gov/prod/2007pubs/p60-233.pdf). Onde essa grana foi parar?
July 17, 2008 at 5:27 pm
marcuscarvalho
Lembram-se como o Japão ia dominar o mundo? É, não deu.
Agora é a China. Segundo “especialistas”, a Terra do Mao (Mal?) será a maior economia em 2035. Imaginem a inflação mundial se essa bolha continuar a inflar?
Para mim a China não é nada mais do que isso: uma imensa bolha.
July 17, 2008 at 5:37 pm
marcuscarvalho
Concluindo…
Se eu fosse apostar qual país estaria em melhor condições no futuro, eu ainda apostaria nos EUA.
Além disso se a China não for uma bolha,o surgimento de outros atores no capitalismo mundial só tem a favorecer aos americanos, que não terão mais que levar o mundo nas costas.
July 17, 2008 at 5:50 pm
Me
Rafael
Usar median household eh complicado. De acordo com a wikipedia:
“Since 1980, US gross domestic product (GDP) per capita has increased 67%[1], while median household income has only increased by 15%.”
Agora, eh obvio que o standard of living desde 1980 cresceu absurdamente. Por essas e outras GDP-pc me parece uma medida mais aplicavel.
July 18, 2008 at 8:25 am
Rafael Figueira
“Usar median household eh complicado”
Alias, se vc quer usar mesmo 1980 como baseline: o income share do top quintile (os 20% mais ricos) passou de 44% para 50%; e do top 1% passou de 10% para 20%. Ou seja, o bolo aumentou mas a diferenca nao foi distribuida para todos.
July 18, 2008 at 11:07 am
Me
Bom isso pode ser. Agora, acho que o median household nao conta beneficios do governo e outros tipos de remuneracao dos empregadores (como planos de saude, stocks, etc). Essas 2 areas aumentaram bastante desde 1980…
Aqui no meu emprego eu recebi uma estatistica de que os beneficios custam quase 30% a mais em cima do meu salario. Esse numero so tem aumentado, sobretudo por causa de health care.
Sem duvida a globalizacao aumentou a reward para os ‘top’ mas nao vejo isso como um problema. A renda geral e o nivel de vida tem aumentado junto.